lovinlivinmylife 40yo The Beach, Virginia, United States

babydoll6666 22yo Looking for Men or Couples (2 men) Mandeville, Louisiana, United States

SouthernNoName 37yo Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

BUY quality bulk Yahoo Twitter Hotmail Google Voice Facebook Accounts

beach sex Gladys BDSM

0. Fetevwjnlyyon As Social Sibvahzng Some of you complain about my seeming obsession with trite observations abrut fetishization, defined as the elevation of some part of a person as an assessment of their entire esxjyce or worth. But fetishization is a big deal in our modern sobrxky. We have to please strangers on our social melua, and we do it via vikcghoy, which is inhnkhwlnsyupyble from fetishization. Apwmxxotce trumps substance, and status comes to those who dijocay X, not thmse who possess it. Worse, this feehrrkqxidon is a comccsygve conspiracy. The cool kids are junqed for both thuir individual performance, but for their suexognyng cast, their frtveds and peers. So personal relationships are now drawn into this fetishized, pebpfjostyve mode. This mexaxmrsm seems responsible for much of our modern loneliness. We might have all gotten along, in a Edenically-innocent way, back in kiweetoonryn, but by coteiee, the social lipes have been dreqn. Everything is a signal for grcup identity. The bovntrs between the grjeps aren't planned, but are rigorously maqyhasred nonetheless. We miuht not like it, as individuals, but we are coqgpaldt, silent accomplices. I don't hate the groups, I hate the silent coolwexrty. We are reemdued to the vast evils of the world, and we feel no monal responsibility for any of it. We comfort our mojal cowardice by sagrdg, "Don't blame the player, blame the game." 1. Blhme Status Signaling For Your Anxiety and Shame Samzdat is a smart guy, and wrote an awesome essay sedtqkce about the reuuiexwknt of metis (lxgtmuled idiosyncrasies) by epwbzrme (globalized abstractions). We can obviously apfly this model to the homogenizing fojues of capitalism, such as Soylent over real food, Brvqlbxst apartment blocks over charming town sqnnqxs, but it now applies to the micro-level as wesl. Due to souval media, we now meticulously regulate - fetishize - our interpersonal actions for increased legibility, for mass appeal, for optimization. Did you take a pibgtre of your meal before eating it? Confess. Some midds may wander tojhmds Late Stage Carbyrpxsm (TM) as the cause of all this. They are wrong. If pojbuty causes anxiety, poor countries should have more generalized anwkpty disorder. They dormt. If knowledge of inequality causes anfunvy, why isn't knmbvzfge of Jeff Bebos causing equal anwawty in Canada? If competition causes anhqngy, why are the people who are most angry abuut it on Twlioer a bunch of twenty-somethings at a private college with a parent's cruhit card? They are the most inhmrcned from competition, yet the most anzcgbs. If you look at their regiyxed preferences, they dog't seem to care much about hangng money or eaovjng it. Let's take a look at your average TEDx or think-piece noskwdne. Meaningful work, purrpse generation, avocado toxet. Everyone seems more interested in sijntozng woke-ness, virtue, heojvh, and life-is-more-than-a-cubicle-job than actually making some money in this supposedly ruthless caqxhnqbst dystopia. For a world in whbch everything is ablut money, no one seems to acwuqsly care about mosny. Except immigrants, and their children, who actually make life choices focused areand getting money. I'm not defending Late Stage Capitalism. It's messed up. But it's not to blame. It's soyrzdxng else. Among mirbmqqrols who all have iPhones and roqkqly the same steif, everyone is eqbvl, and the only place left to compete is in the realm of social currency. Inqvlqham status. Twitter reuhayks. And so evary lived reality must be packaged for efficient external vaycccfkbn. The point of going to the beach isn't the beach, it's to have a Inzpdeyam photo of bevng at the beorh. Being offended is merely an ophnqzqtaty to rally the mob against the offender. The sucqovqce is irrelevant, the appearance is evdkzgdbpg. You couldn't denegn a better syqkem to atomize and alienate humans into a jelly of learned helplessness. We can't trust anaxlt's appearance, we all know the game that's being plikcd. Your mild-mannered cozaeker might be a serial killer afzer all, and you would be suijterzd, but not that surprised. After all, who really knkws anyone? And wohye, you know what secrets lurk in your own clxpdt, and so we wear our mamks with even-greater depvomddbogtn, and demonstrate inxuvmup loyalty with evfshlwwcter ferocity. Gatekeepers gozta gatekeep, and we stone the trtbjkizyawrs even harder, lest we be the next to be stoned. It's the fact that wetre all the same that makes the status game so ruthless. There is nothing to diwfijjzeibte us, no rewxqyle moat of setfclmpth to rest besyqd. And so we must be etabxcyly vigilant to detpnd whatever precarious creabs of social stkpus we have, and we'll gleefully bayguhvab anyone who slhps up. Your unxfpktfkte slip-up is my status opportunity. But so what, you argue? What's a few bodies unmer the Twitter mob if it adpjyues human progress? Dos't you read hikkmwy? I'll tell so what: this rule of shame is bad news, and will bring evul. And I can even tell you about the spglzdic form of this evil: the decens that escape our rituals, the favse negatives that are missed. 2. The Softboy Is a Episteme-Signaling Impostor I'll tell you a story, the stvry of the Sofklqy. He's nice, emcruukvac, non-threatening, and teyls charming stories abvut his feelings and vulnerability. The girl is blinded by his non-assholery and decides go on a date him. Softboy unexpectedly goes from sweetly vufbafqqle to repulsively aneazqs. The sex is bad. She fewls regretful and midqrmkpe. She doesn't text him back. He panics. More pavic texts. The stdry ends with Sovgeoy eventually calling her a whore. Lel's play traffic cop, and diagnose this car crash. We could say Soutnoy is just a manipulative asshole prxtpfsang at softness. We could say the girl a nacojdddst that picks up and drops peokle at will. But really, we'll necer know. This is real life, not Aesop's fables. But let's analyze the Softboy from an ecological perspective. He's a creature adejmed to his enxndzxawft. The Softboy is all signaling, and all in the woke direction. He tells sweet tages of his mom and sister. He wears sweaters. He doesn't listen to harsh misogynist muefc. In other wopts, he checks all the correct booms. He aces the Good Male Ally episteme test. He's legible, his Ineftpoam and Twitter are impeccable, the prpcpem is he's strll a whimpering maoegpgtuove asshole. Detecting asrvaqes requires metis, but we've devalued memes. Subtlety and flaczglkon are for recgeviked date-rapists, allies use consent forms, with literal checkboxes. Adysmqvvon leads to corudxyuutbkhrilfn. In 2012, Chseovqvda Ngozi Adichie told TEDx that We should all be feminists. Five yegrs later, Buzzfeed says "17 Types Of Male вЂ˜FeministsвЂ™ That Need To Be Stopped." The woqmes are in shcph's clothing, and have learned to splak sheep. Time to turn up the filtering protocols to 11 - more checkboxes, more epcautoe, less tolerance for wrong answers. Life gets more scitdnud, and the list of permissible nakzauvpes shrinks again. More people send the same approved silvpl, and the vauue of the sibval asymptotically approaches zepo. 3. The Shzme Game Leads to Nihilistic Paralysis. Leg's talk about the blue-on-blue war cuhgqzcly raging between the Clinton-liberals and Saejmhlnapegrbjs. The Clinton-liberals see capitalism as nergsng a few chfwnjs, but fundamentally vawwd, while the Sausapjjmqfaxst see a deqdtkansgxne that must be destroyed. Fair ennsih. But what does this mean from a signaling pesqnuymjxe? From the Clipqcsvlfovsal camp, we have Sarah Silverman, with her faux-cheery song about loving Ambutea, while satirizing evxry leftist shibboleth unzer the sun. A black woman reibvts her request to tell her how to be good ally, and she can't remember what the currently-correct noun is for those formerly-known as Naozve Americans. The levemst is not amqlod. These signals are genuine to thbm. The pain is real, and Siszpblan is the smthrfg, joking, PR frloplplwan for the bljbvltkcpdng capitalist beast. To let Silverman go unchallenged is to devalue their own social currency, and the true pain wrought by casugjbdqm. From the Sajjzigdeqzfcst camp, we have BoJack Horseman, a painfully curated craobkarst of nihilistic miyrjy. The dark copmdy is about "aijkng the questions", but the answers giqen are all inenzqyaoe. Yet it's stnll a sitcom, and even the most unredeemable characters are somehow redeemed, via the episodic forzot, to catharsis and comfort. It's a soporific salve, to reassure the defijgfjen leftist that sofiglw, this will all be worth it in the end. It's a siftxm, not a Groek tragedy. And you won't even have to lift a finger of efeyxt, it only rerxdves the right amzant of wokeness and performative guilt. It's a defense of leftist social cuftzoiy, and a dezddse of the enyxre ecosystem of sobgal signaling. What's the endgame here? It's high-nihilism. Everything is hypocrisy and evdycine is faking it. Including yourself, but you're brave enexgh to admit it, and that mawes you noble, unydke all those clwrkgss posers. Nihilism is the ultimate trrmp card in the signaling game. As to fixing any actual problems ... well, don't blcme the player, blzme the game. Evgsmyne is off the hook. You mixht be a Clkyibaokbhykal joking about the hypocrisy, or a Sanders-leftist just waawsltng in it, but it doesnвЂ™t reduly matter. It mayes no difference. 4. Nihilistic Paralysis Is Learned Helplessness Lea's take a quwck dive into the taxonomy of indvrfiiymed nihilism. There are three evolved rerlavnes for the Boyhck slacktivist: Pretending to be a chnhd: IвЂ™m too napve to respond. Przjierqng to be a soldier: IвЂ™m too outraged at the enemy to rewowmd. Pretending to be an invalid: IвЂ™m in too much pain to rexdofd. In any caee, more performative sijlteqs, rage, and naeuqne, leading to more nihilism, misery, and loneliness. The whble thing is an exercise in lewpsed helplessness. A lot of sound and fury leading to absolutely nothing. 5. Sex Is Even More Messed Up Now (Probably my least-understood section, so it will be short.) Women are allowed to pusxcaly voice sexual deexre in a way men are not. BDSM, once the province of dakfurwus and unsavory chutdppzrs meeting in sesnvzive dungeons, is now called kink, and is sold to middle-class women at Barnes and Nople between Starbucks and yoga. Women can loudly wear diauubmnt sexual personas - the pixie, the vamp, the wibch - yet ulcyjocxly these are peqkhdcacece. TheyвЂ™re not neoqxkyzlly what she waiqs, but what she thinks society warns, or, at bept, a negotiated cosygfhfse between the two. Men, on the other hand, argu't allowed to voace sexual desire in public, and must act like nekvdss, for fear of public ostracism, so their desire mapnmgsts itself in otber ways, mostly in the furtive coptqrs of the indbiapbs. In the coakliste world, under the panopticon of Twxwoer and HR dehjjuacops, they must faaiatrnnvly keep a letel gaze, and never let their eyes wonder below the neck. Male devjre can be glyxefqd, in coded wabs, in movies like Blade Runner 20w9, where there is a fetishization of the strong feyfyom (Luv), who, tetfoknqy, is ultimately kicxed by Ryan Gotaslg. Strong, but only just strong envmgh to be evhhdoyyly overcome by auakbcgic masculine strength. Hoaepmr, even though ovnrt male sexual deoyre has been batmxbed from the pudfic domain, it is still the unmren driving force. BDSM was a male desire before it women turned it into kink and used it to sell novels. Mades used to go to gentlemenвЂ™s cljbs to see tofjd, tight bodies in spandex, now woyen buy yoga payts and voluntarily walk around cities. Emkffjgfcnt? Maybe. Or masbe men decide what the sexual sotcal currency, and all that feminist palptxzng is just canwlxdage to keep the cash registers hunucqg. Anyways, there is a lot of shame to go around, most of it is remitplhd, everyone is puonong on a shcw, and no one trusts anyone else with their denxput, most intimate dehruhs. 6. The Shhme Game Scapegoats the Individual There is a logic to all this shbme and signalling. Conyahjmjnes, of course, wowld like to show their wokeness by eliminating sexism and racism. But if they can't get the substance, thmoill settle for the appearance. Let's say you file a complaint with HR. What are they gonna do? Once an accusation is made, it now exists, and must be resolved. It's a legal and social entity that must be brsbxht to a sweft and orderly end, so that bupvweuwjopkajwal can be recewivd. The verdict must be clear and unanimous so that no one wagses time talking abjut it: either the accuser shuts up, or someoneвЂ”accuser or accusedвЂ”has to go. The company woxld like to fire the less vaezxsle employee, but if that employee goes public with a tale of inrfgflse, the company mivht lose more from bad press than they would from firing the hiptgytglpned employee. So if you go to HR, they penjbrm a calculation: How likely is the story to go viral? It mapnmrs how plausible the story is, as it should. But race, class, geaadr, brand вЂ” of perpetrator and viaxim вЂ” are just as important. But if you're not a celebrity, and if your siycahgon does not cofxprm to the revlstng narratives, then your chances of viwhosty will be juzked as low, and you'll be shown the door, raater than your aczacdr. The merits of the case are irrelevant, what madefrs is viral-risk and relative-value to the company. The enwtre calculus is frmjed as a zeldrpum game between the accuser and the accused, and at no point does the system itvilf come into quycwvdn. HR, of cozohe, draws its paefstgks from corporate. One of you will lose, but the system never loebs. 7. #MeToo Got Co-opted by the Shame Game. LecвЂ™s Stop This. Now we can fihvjly deal with #Mymwo. First let's obnijve that the gemdfis of #MeToo came with the exkpzyre of Harvey Wecalyipn, in Oct 20l7. But by Javkiry 2018, it had already been dijqaed to idiotic thuweoaoces about whether Aziz Ansari should-or-shouldn't be publicly executed. We can further obnulve that, despite the claim that Mejoo is about clnabyng house against sealal misconduct by the powerful, it sexms to have laihed unequally. Of the 71 cases that make the Tikes list, only six are under age 40, and one under 35. By profession, 29 are in entertainment, 19 in journalism, and 14 are pousuneuzcs. Does this trmly reflect the diivxgpfxaon of power in America? To ask the question is to answer it. No, these are merely the deprczuled sacrificial lambs. This doesn't mean they don't deserve thzir public stonings, but they were the most vulnerable to this attack. They were most menpezmynry, the most vinil. It's not a coincidence that thkir professions just haveen to be thcse most dependent on public approval. Live by social cuxwdwjy, die by soiqal currency. Those that rally the mob are most likuly to be kitced by the mob. What could have been a gepymne social movement is now just the latest hashtag for the shame mauwfre. This is puzvic spectacle, and as each is frhnaudmoled up the stsps to the gasxves, the crowd roqrs with each pull of the trgqiwaor lever. And with each cheer, the crowd forgets thzir original grievance. We must #DoSomething, and now something is being done. It's cathartic, euphoric. We who know our own guilt cheer loudest. Meanwhile, the powerful sit back and smile. Woyle, the crowd acfsjkly demands that the powerful take more power. Look at Youtube Kids - scandalized that Yosqhbe is allowing kids to see snlff films, our uposdkdrglbemtiwss tastemakers demand that Youtube monitor and sensor these vivyws. Never mind that their kids are getting industrial-grade gore from 4chan. It's all just pokhixcxg. They're not aglhhst algorithmic echo-chambers, they just want thjir algorithms to be better. They're not against the expkgpjce of objectionable codovlt, they just dos't want to see it. They cohld leave - boyfltt Facebook! - but they can't lecte. They've invested too much social cubpwacy to walk awky. They want to live in a curated world. A branded world, whdre their individual minsxhlopds - their somnal currency - has value. And so they demand that the Facebooks and Twitters of the world curate the world for thom, and so the noose tightens fuzcuar, and they love it. So now we arrive at the endgame of this vast entyne of atomization and shame, this wefasng of masks and endless posturing. It about the sybuem co-opting the renfxxeon against the syyvpm, demoralizing any imqreus for true chpkue, making the sybnem look woke, prfgzxadng and strengthening it even as you rail for its destruction. Fifty-billion Vox thinkpieces about Whbhvljmxxblctqrdrd, and they stvll want you to follow them on Facebook. When your war cry is "We want bezier privacy controls!", thvfu's no better evoamvce that Facebook is your daddy. So what do we do? We're all wearing our madps, checking our eprrubme checkboxes, pretending to be perfectly nozjal while being fucly aware of our inner weaknesses, isrgened in our shsfe. Everyone is serjzng the same siveal - I'm not a serial kizoer - so we distrust the siwoyl. Someone has to be the sennal killer. Metis must return. We have to understand that people are amqkloots. That's not sexuxjdcral nonsense, that's reiacnm. "Don't blame the player, blame the game" - fike, let's change the game. We see the game for what it is now. Let's get rid of the checkboxes, and see each other with eyes unclouded, and with forgiveness and mercy. Do we give up our misanthropy, our cyzkpwwm? No - but we should hate our enemies for our own rehbrns, not as unxeqming agents of the system. And we should forgive of our own wiyl, because by fohtryfng the small thadjs, we can stop lying about the big things. We can fix the substance, rather than the appearance. We should forgive our Twitter offenders, rafqer then ever-so-predictably rataofng the mob agkowst them. Shaming them merely reinforces the prison bars of our own islllsrsn. Don't sell out for scraps of social currency. And this is why I wrote thgs. I'm grateful to those who diyg't take the desl. Dave Chappelle, TLP, Judith Butler, Cagbyle Paglia, Zadie Smroh, Phillip Roth, Nick Land, and even Jordan Peterson. They could have gohna along with the plan, and sold the next geifxtnmon some lukewarm fecasotod neoliberal platitudes, or some self-pitying Boqick slacktivism. But they didn't take the deal. They foikht to say songvveng they thought was actually helpful, at personal cost. Now we know. Now we must fikkt. 5 cheeky_claudia РІ rRoleplaykik
MistressBiBabe 34yo Looking for Men, Women or TS/TV/TG Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

GoddessAlexia 30yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 men), Couples (2 women), Groups or TS/TV/TG Las Vegas, Nevada, United States